Cases 11 - 20 of 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BREEDEN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00617
Petitioner:
AL DEMETRIUS BREEDEN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
El-Alamin v. Kelly et al
as 5:2023hc02081
Petitioner:
Malik Al Mustafa El-Alamin
Respondent:
Warden L.B. Kelly and Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wilcher v. Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Al Malik Wilcher
Defendant:
Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Morrison v. Evans et al
as 5:2022ct03407
Plaintiff:
Randolph Morrison
Defendant:
Dr. Charlotte Ann Evans, Nurse Rhonna Medlin, Kendell Mullens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022hc02168
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
