Cases 11 - 19 of 19
TAYLOR v. INDIANAPOLIS POWER LI
as 1:2016cv00625
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS POWER LI
Plaintiff:
JAMES TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morales v. Five Below, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
Michael Morales
Defendant:
Five Below, Inc. , Fung Capital, USA , Li & Fung (Trading) Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANCHEZ v. LI'S SUPER BUFFET, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00807
Defendant:
HUANG MEI JIAN, HUI LI, LI'S SUPER BUFFET, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ELOY SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
T.V. v. AMERICAN MARKETING ENTERPRISES et al
as 1:2012cv01330
Defendant:
AMERICAN MARKETING ENTERPRISES, KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. and LI & FUNG LIMITED
Plaintiff:
T. V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
L I Combs & Sons Inc v. Creekside of Meadowbrook West LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00354
Plaintiff:
LI Combs & Sons Inc
Defendant:
Creekside of Meadowbrook West LLC, Prudential Huntoon Paige Associates Ltd, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Turcsik v. Mitcheff et al
as 3:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
Stephen J Turcsik
Defendant:
Dr Michael Mitcheff, Barbara Brubaker, Dr John Israel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HECKLER & KOCH, INC. v. LI
as 1:2009cv00748
Plaintiff:
HECKLER & KOCH, INC. and HECKLER & KOCH, INC.
Defendant:
THOMAS LI and THOMAS LI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
LI MARZI v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00715
Plaintiff:
TERRY M. LI MARZI
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Li et al v. Veschak et al
as 2:2007cv00254
Plaintiff:
Zhen Li and Qi Ming Yang
Defendant:
Officer Veschak, Merrillville Town of and Merrillville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
