Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Reebok International Limited v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv01100
Plaintiff: REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (a limited company of the United Kingdom) and Reebok International Limited
Defendant: Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv01084
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01043
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv01019
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv00936
Counter Defendant: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant: Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. et al v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00899
Plaintiff: Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP
Defendant: USPTO, Department of Commerce, Andrew Hirshfeld and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv00892
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv00884
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Pavlov et al v. Hirshfeld We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00573
Plaintiff: Dr. Elan Pavlov, Hints, Inc. and Elan Pavlov
Defendant: Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv00177
Counter Defendant: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant: Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?