Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Black v. Anheuser-Busch in Bev et al
as 1:2014cv02693
Plaintiff:
Randall M. Black
Defendant:
Anheuser-Busch in Bev , Tommy Shannon, Ray McLoughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martinez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06201
Defendant:
City of New York, Frank Collafluri, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06893
Plaintiff:
Angel Martinez
Defendant:
City of New York , John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez-Juarez v. Moshi Moshi Catering, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00634
Defendant:
Gary Geyer, Moshi Moshi Catering, Inc. and Chung Ming Shi
Plaintiff:
Angel Martinez-Juarez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martinez v. USA
as 1:2012cv03573
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Angel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martinez v. Wright et al
as 1:2009cv06470
Plaintiff:
Angel Martinez
Defendant:
Lester Wright, J. Perilli, Rosen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Little West 12th LLC et al
as 1:2009cv01377
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Martinez
Defendant:
Little West 12th LLC, Salvatore Felix and Humberto Leon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carrero et al v. Britten et al
as 1:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
Dominick Carrero and Angel Martinez
Defendant:
Matthew Britten and "John Doe" Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Breslin
as 1:2007cv08671
Petitioner:
Angel Martinez, Jr.
Respondent:
Dennis Breslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. A Russo Wrecking et al
as 1:2007cv07116
Plaintiff:
Angel Martinez
Defendant:
A Russo Wrecking, ABM Industries, Inc., ABM Janitorial Northeast, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
