Cases 11 - 20 of 24
DAY v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2015cv00863
Petitioner:
ANTHONY DAY
Respondent:
LARRY MAHALLY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Day v. Erpenbach
as 4:2014cv04047
Plaintiff:
Tony Anthony Day
Defendant:
Jon Erpenbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Minnehaha County et al
as 4:2014cv04037
Plaintiff:
Tony Anthony Day
Defendant:
Minnehaha County, Minnehaha County Jail and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACKERMAN et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05853
Plaintiff:
PAULA ACKERMAN , RUBY ADAMS , CARL AGNELLO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Tony Anthony Day
as 13-2907
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Tony Anthony Day, also known as "50 Cent", also known as "50"
Ackerman et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03049
Plaintiff:
Paula Ackerman , Ruby Adams , Carl Agnello and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOYNER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01610
Plaintiff:
DERRAN JOYNER , BETTY WYATT , M. W. and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
WASHINGTON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01544
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , ANTHONY DAY and SHALANA MCCOMMONS
Plaintiff:
SHEILA WASHINGTON , M. W. , CHANTAL MADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Day v. United States
as 4:2012cv04001
Petitioner:
Tony Anthony Day
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Windham v. Dill et al
as 1:2009cv02239
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Defendant:
Nate Dill, Ortiz, Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
