Cases 11 - 20 of 24
HOOVER EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ADULT DIVISION
as 1:2018cv00296
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ADULT DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOVER-EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATION, et al.
as 1:2017cv00736
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER-EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATION, et al., STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.E.R.T. et al and LOGAN TODD BURKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOVER-EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2017cv00668
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER-EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and LOGAN TODD BURKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOVER-EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2015cv00550
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER-EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOVER EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2014cv00581
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOOVER ELS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2014cv00564
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER ELS
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOVER v. JACKSON
as 1:2013cv00892
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Respondent:
BUTCH JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellis v. USA
as 4:2012cv00059
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony Leon Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOOVER v. LAMM et al
as 1:2010cv00165
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
TAMMY BRYANT, RICHARD BROADWELL, COMBEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2010cv00129
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Respondent:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, MICHAEL J. LAMM, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
