Cases 11 - 20 of 132
Tiarra Abell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05038
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Abell, Amelita Armendarez, Thomas Ash and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Abell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00831
Plaintiff:
Abell, Tiarra Abell, Amelita Armendarez and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Abell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Abell, Amelita Armendarez, Thomas Ash and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mendoza v. El Taconazo La Fiesta et al
as 1:2021cv06872
Plaintiff:
Josefina Heras Mendoza and Giovanni Arceo
Defendant:
El Taconazo La Fiesta, Alfredo Arceo, Rodolfo Arceo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ARCEO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01994
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO ARCEO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexis Arceo v. GRMR, Ltd.
as 8:2021cv01728
Plaintiff:
Alexis Arceo
Defendant:
GRMR, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ARCEO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv31577
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO ARCEO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. CHP et al
as 2:2021cv00287
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol and Angel Arceo
Plaintiff:
David Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC)Arceo v. Tetreault
as 2:2020cv02339
Plaintiff:
Anthony Arceo
Defendant:
Gabrielle Tetreault
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arceo v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2020at01156
Defendant:
City of Roseville, Daniel Timoney, CEP - America - California DBA Vituity Hospitalists and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Arceo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
