Cases 11 - 20 of 423
Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stevenson Armstrong
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moses v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00647
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Donte Moses
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and Jerry Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. McLennan County, Texas et al
as 6:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lovell Berry
Defendant:
McLennan County, Texas, Parnell McNamara, Ricky Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrison v. Wheeler et al
as 6:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
William Scott Garrison
Defendant:
Jennifer Wheeler, David Stebbins, FNU Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
as 3:2023cv01858
Plaintiff:
Bob Armstrong and Luke Armstrong
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Armstrong v. City of Houston, Texas
as 4:2023cv03003
Plaintiff:
Antonio Armstrong and Antonio Armstrong, Jr
Defendant:
City of Houston, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lumsden v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, FNU Hazelwood, A. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Nurse Mr. Hutt et al
as 4:2023cv02477
Plaintiff:
Preston Lee Dean
Defendant:
Nurse Mr. Hutt and Nurse Mrs. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mungaray v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mungaray
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Patrick L. O'Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
