Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Arreola v. DTK Facility Services, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv03144
Plaintiff:
Juan Arreola
Defendant:
DTK Facility Services, LLC and Ryan Bishop
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Crawford v. Zamora et al
as 2:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kelly M. Crawford
Defendant:
Andrea Zamora, Angelica Arreola, Arturo Velarde Romo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Rios v. M&M's Welding and Fabricating, Inc.
as 4:2022cv02003
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Arreola Rios
Defendant:
M&M's Welding and Fabricating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Arreola v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2022cv00143
Petitioner:
Aldo Arreola
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Trevino v. Arreola et al
as 3:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Coronado Trevino
Defendant:
Ismael Arreola doing business as Arreola Body Shop 1 and Arreolas Body Shop 2 LLC
Perez Diaz et al v. Unico en Sabores, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01036
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Bautista Diaz, Fernando Bautista Diaz and Ides Perez Diaz
Defendant:
Unico en Sabores, Inc., Israel Arreola Jr., Sinergy Workforce Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Arreola v. United States of America
as 7:2021cv00044
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jose Adrian Arreola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00836
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
O'Brien v. Garcia et al
as 9:2020cv00117
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Sue O'Brien
Defendant:
Jesus Eligio Arreola Garcia and MJM Reliable Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kreper v. Williamson County et al
as 1:2020cv00255
Defendant:
Jose Arreola, Williamson County, Sgt. FNU Paniagua and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Kreper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
