Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Robinson v. Ash (MAG+)
as 1:2016cv00879
Plaintiff:
Ruth L. Robinson
Defendant:
Shane Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullough et al v. The City of Montgomery, Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv00463
Plaintiff:
Angela McCullough , Marquita Johnson , Kenny Jones and others
Defendant:
The City of Montgomery, Alabama , Ernest N. Finley, Jr. , Kevin Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ash v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
David Ash, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ashe v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00375
Plaintiff:
Richard Christopher Ashe
Defendant:
Karla Jones and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
May v. Nationwide Insurance Company of America
as 5:2014cv00924
Plaintiff:
Tamela Ashely May
Defendant:
Nationwide Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pouncey v. Summerlin et al (MAG+)
as 1:2012cv00848
Plaintiff:
Steven Young Pouncey
Defendant:
Chris Summerlin , Susie Peters , Tom Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashe v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2011cv01188
Plaintiff:
Latacha Monay Ashe
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adams et al v. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Adams , Thomas Adams , Jacqueline Alexander and others
Defendant:
Bally Gaming, Inc. , Cadillac Jack, Inc. , IGT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Private Capital Group, Inc. et al v. BRAL Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv01398
Plaintiff:
Private Capital Group, Inc. , NMB Investments, Inc. , Michael Robinson and others
Defendant:
BRAL Holdings, LLC, David R. Bennett and David W. Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goldsby et al v. Ash et al
as 2:2010cv00187
Plaintiff:
Sherry Goldsby and Teyonna Olds
Defendant:
David Ash , Pete Bernier , Connie Messer and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
