Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01260
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHUKLA v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEMS et al
as 2:2020cv05634
Defendant:
CAPITAL HEALTH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, JOANNA ROHDE, PENN MEDICINE UNIVERSITY CITY and others
Plaintiff:
ASHU SHUKLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAY v. RANGOS et al
as 2:2020cv01518
Defendant:
COUNTY OF GREENE, SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, JUDGE JILL E. RANGOS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN R. SHAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Terry v. Ramson et al
as 2:2020cv03521
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, District Attorney of Norristown, PA, Montgomery County, Kevin Ramson and others
Petitioner:
Nathan Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pratt v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 3:2020cv00150
Plaintiff:
Henry Pratt
Defendant:
Embassy of Liberia, Washington, D.C., York County Prison, Immigration Custom Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00146
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00199
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00184
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARTINEZ-MATA v. BRADLEY, et al
as 3:2018cv00161
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ-MATA
Respondent:
ERIC BRADLEY, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VAUGHN v. BRADLEY
as 3:2018cv00142
Petitioner:
TYRONE VAUGHN
Defendant:
WARDEN BRADLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
