Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Wetter v. Howard
as 2:2020cv02202
Respondent:
Christopher Howard
Petitioner:
Jonathan Eduardo Avila Wetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Solan v. Arizona State Hospital
as 2:2020cv02209
Defendant:
Arizona State Hospital, Cara Christ, Lisa Wynn and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Phillip Solan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wescott v. Avila et al
as 2:2020cv01925
Plaintiff:
Carl A Wescott
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Daniel Otazo, Coastline Investments SA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Avila v. Used Car Showcase 1 LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01756
Defendant:
Used Car Showcase 1 LLC and Jessica Diana Flores Ortega
Plaintiff:
Natalia Avila
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710
Moore #275487 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01223
Defendant:
Unknown Emole, Unknown Wallis, Unknown Manley and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dale Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Geoffrey Townsend, Louis Avila, Pima County Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Horton, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Indiana Western Express Incorporated v. Deol et al
as 3:2019cv08257
Plaintiff:
Indiana Western Express Incorporated
Defendant:
Harchand S Deol, Ricardo Avila Madrigal and Harchand S Deol doing business as DB Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Avila v. Wilson et al
as 2:2019cv04581
Defendant:
Gregory Wilson, Phoenix Police Department and Phoenix, City of
Plaintiff:
Bryan Gerardo Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv04524
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Vincent Companaro
Plaintiff:
Bryan Gerardo Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv04431
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Vincent Campanaro and Joseph M Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Bryan Gerardo Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
