Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Furnace v. Cope et al
as 1:2016cv00420
Plaintiff:
Edward Furnace
Defendant:
B. Cope, A. Alafa, J. Harden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLX Capital Real Estate LLC v. Marine Retail Management of Rocklin LLC et al
as 8:2011mc00013
Plaintiff:
BLX Capital Real Estate LLC
Defendant:
Frank W Cope, Jo Ann Cope, Lisa J Cope and others
BLX Capital Real Estate LLC v. Marine Retail Management of Rocklin LLC et al
as 8:2011mc00012
Plaintiff:
BLX Capital Real Estate LLC
Defendant:
Frank W Cope, Jo Ann Cope, Lisa J Cope and others
Montgomery Sibley v. Arthur Rothenberg, et al
as 10-13297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTHUR L. ROTHENBERG, SCOTT M. BERNSTEIN, DAVID M. GERSTEN and others
Latwahn McElroy v. Staily, et al
as 10-15388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LATWAHN MCELROY
Defendant - Appellee:
STAILY, C/O and B. COPE, C/O
McElroy v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 1:2007cv01677
Plaintiff:
Latwahn McElroy
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Knowles, C Chrones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sibley v. Rothenberg et al
as 1:2009cv22994
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Blair Sibley
Defendant:
Arthur L. Rothenberg, Scott M. Bernstein, David M. Gersten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Cope et al
as 1:2009cv01617
Plaintiff:
Lance R. Martin
Defendant:
B. Cope, Chesly, J. Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AWALA v. QUINCE et al
as 1:2007cv00239
Plaintiff:
GBEKE MICHAEL AWALA
Defendant:
QUINCE, CANTERO, PARIENTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv02252
Plaintiff:
Lawahn McElroy
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Knowles, C Chrones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
