Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Price v. Shepherd
as 6:2013cv00303
Plaintiff:
Eric R Price
Defendant:
B. J. Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Shepherd
as 1:2013cv00522
Plaintiff:
Eric R Price
Defendant:
B J Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wickenkamp v. Smith et al
as 6:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Mary Wickenkamp
Defendant:
Clay Smith, Andrew Strotman, B & J Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Pratt v. Harris County, Texas et al
as 4:2012cv01770
Plaintiff:
Erony Pratt
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas , Adrian Garcia , Michael Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tredway v. Morgan et al
as 6:2012cv00144
Defendant:
Deputy J. R. Howard, Judge Jame Morgan, Investigator Adam Sadler, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Tredway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Vela et al v. Manning et al
as 3:2011cv00685
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Vela and Anna Vela
Defendant:
Bradley M Manning, American National Insurance, R G Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eubanks v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv01353
Petitioner:
B J Eubanks
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drgac v. Treon et al
as 4:2007cv04283
Plaintiff:
Ray Allen Drgac
Defendant:
Robert Treon, Kevin Mayfield and B J Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. B & J Vacuum Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv03949
Defendant:
B & J Vacuum Service, Inc. and Patrick Kelly Wilmot
Plaintiff:
Pamela Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
