Cases 11 - 20 of 99
SCOTTO v. MAIMONIDES et al
as 2:2022cv03626
Plaintiff:
LIVIA SCOTTO
Defendant:
MAIMONIDES, UNITED STATES, SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN LEHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beatty v. Gardner et al
as 4:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Kyle Beatty
Defendant:
Clinton Gardner and Calvin Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCOTTO v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2022cv03434
Plaintiff:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, JONATHAN BEATTY, MICHAEL DUNLAP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Clark v. Weaver et al
as 1:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Mark Clark
Defendant:
J. Weaver, Sgt. John Doe Smouse, Lt. John Doe Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beatty-White v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Aisha Beatty-White
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Beatty v. Cook et al
as 3:2021cv00405
Respondent:
Hon. Musti Cook, York County Probation, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and others
Petitioner:
Takanii D. Beatty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
