Cases 11 - 20 of 21
BELLAMY v. RUMER et al
as 4:2020cv00127
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BELLAMY and MICHAEL D JOHNSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM C RUMER, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and JULIA SLATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellamy v. Rumer et al
as 1:2020cv02554
Plaintiff:
George Bellamy
Defendant:
Judge William C. Rumer, Superior Court of Muscogee County and Julia Slater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellamy v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01355
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bellamy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00156
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Clark et al v. Porter et al
as 1:2014cv02128
Plaintiff:
Jason Joseph Clark and Tamah Jada Clark
Defendant:
Daniel J. Porter, Nathan Deal, Thomas Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mounts et al v. Bellamy et al
as 2:2012cv00117
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Jamie Mounts and Richard Kimble Mounts
Defendant:
Robert Salone Bellamy , Wilkes Trucking, LLC and Sentry Select Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bellamy v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 5:2011cv00058
Plaintiff:
Laura K. Bellamy
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association , One West Bank, FSB and IndyMAC Mortgage Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bellamy v. One West Bank et al
as 5:2010cv00020
Plaintiff:
Laura K. Bellamy
Defendant:
One West Bank, Indy Mac Mortgage Services and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bryan v. Bellamy
as 1:2009cv02525
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Bryan
Defendant:
Benny Bellamy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
