Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Berry-Boles v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv10609
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Margaret Berry-Boles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry-Boles v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv10610
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Margaret Berry-Boles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evanston Insurance Company v. CRD Metalworks LLC et al
as 3:2019cv12403
Defendant:
Corey Berry and CRB Metal Works
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evanston Insurance Company v. CRD Metalworks LLC et al
as 1:2019cv12403
Defendant:
Corey Berry and CRB Metal Works
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roy v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv12103
Defendant:
Vita A. Cassese, John R. Whitten, Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Isabelle Roy
BERRY v. Town of Hadley et al
as 3:2019cv30104
Plaintiff:
Tiffany A BERRY
Defendant:
Officer MICHAEL A. ROMANO, Sergeant DOUGLAS COSTA, Town of Hadley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. USA
as 1:2016cv11032
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Stephen C. Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Berry v.McLean Southeast Psychiatric Hospital
as 1:2016cv10306
Petitioner:
Bethany A. Berry
Respondent:
McLean Southeast Psychiatric Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Opalenik et al v. Bartlett et al
as 3:2015cv30199
Plaintiff:
Stephen Opalenik, Jr and Diane R Opalenik
Defendant:
Adam J. Bartlett, Thomas Tudryn, William Tudryn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coulter v. Jamsan Hotel Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv13355
Defendant:
Choice Hotels, Jamsan Hotel Management, Inc., Jamsan Investments, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Coulter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
