Cases 11 - 20 of 197
Davis v. Tamrat et al
as 1:2022cv02706
Not Classified By Court:
Mary Bond Lonon
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Asrat H. Tamrat and Tana Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Davis v. Tamrat et al
as 2:2022cv02706
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Asrat H. Tamrat and Tana Logistics, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Mary Bond Lonon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Bond v. Kissell, et al
as 1:2022cv01209
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Kacey Kissell, Kent Treece and Karl Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gage v. Vision Path
as 1:2022cv01196
Not Classified By Court:
Mary Bond Lonon
Plaintiff:
Patricia Gage
Defendant:
Vision Path
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Bond v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv01188
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Karl Jackson, Kasye Kissell and Kent Treece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. South Central Correctional Facility Medical Staff
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Eric O. Bond
Defendant:
South Central Correctional Facility Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonds v. USA
as 1:2022cv00158
Petitioner:
Cordarrius Bonds
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bond v. Treece et al
as 1:2022cv01113
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Kent Treece, Kasye Kissell, Michael Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Cain et al
as 1:2022cv01109
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Michael Cain, Ava Little and Michael Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Treece et al
as 1:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Kent Treece, Kasye Kissell and Maggie Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
