Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Brown v. Dennis et al
as 3:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Randall K Stewart, Bryan Keith Griffin, Pam Haynesworth and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Alexander Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Parker et al
as 7:2017cv01820
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bonner
Defendant:
Todd Parker, Christopher Michael Bain, Keith Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2016cv03445
Plaintiff:
Lamont T Bonner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bonner v. Walmart et al
as 7:2014cv04884
Plaintiff:
Karahn Bonner
Defendant:
Walmart , Walmart Stores Inc , John Doe Corporation No 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Lil Dd'z Inc et al
as 7:2012cv00218
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Lil Dd'z Inc and Judith Leigh Bonner
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Bonner v. Sonny's Restaurant et al
as 7:2011cv02823
Plaintiff:
Enoch Bonner
Defendant:
Sonny's Restaurant and Cherokee County Solicitor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2011cv00818
Plaintiff:
Russell Bonner
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bonner v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2011cv00818
Plaintiff:
Russell Bonner
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bonner v. Raymond et al
as 6:2009cv02298
Plaintiff:
Annette Bonner and Annette Bonner
Defendant:
Michael Raymond and Housing Authority of the City of Greenville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonner v. Rivera
as 8:2007cv01498
Petitioner:
William Lamar Bonner
Respondent:
M L Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
