Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Estate of Emily Reardon, James Reardon Administrator v. Monsees et al
as 2:2022cv02625
Plaintiff:
Estate of Emily Reardon, James Reardon Administrator
Defendant:
James Monsees, Philip Morris USA Inc., Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hairston v. Sparks et al
as 2:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Sparks, Theodore Jackson, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Sparks et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Sparks, Theodore Jackson, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Park National Bank - Trustee of the Mabel J. Bowen Irrevocable Trust v. Southwestern Energy Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv05803
Plaintiff:
Park National Bank - Trustee of the Mabel J. Bowen Irrevocable Trust and Park National Bank
Defendant:
Southwestern Energy Corporation, Montage Resources Corporation and Eclipse Resources I, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodson v. Remish et al
as 4:2021cv02291
Plaintiff:
Aaron Woodson
Defendant:
Mr. Remish, Mr. Jackson, Warden Richard Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marykay Bowen v. Social Security Commissioner
as 1:2021cv02206
Plaintiff:
Marykay Bowen
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Swain v. Bowen, Jr.
as 4:2021cv02190
Petitioner:
Sean Swain
Respondent:
Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hairston v. Bowen
as 2:2021cv04385
Petitioner:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Respondent:
Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hairston v. Bowen
as 4:2021cv01644
Petitioner:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Respondent:
Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04176
Plaintiff:
Ryan Bowen
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
