Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Bowen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03932
Plaintiff:
Theresa Bowen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gathright et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03745
Plaintiff:
Gladys Gathright , Wilma Berger , Marva Bevis and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowen v. Hiteland Transportation LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Zachary L. Bowen
Defendant:
Hiteland Transportation LLC and Lewis L. Reeger, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McCarthy et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03344
Plaintiff:
Treva McCarthy , Toni Adkison , Martha Anderson and others
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Endo Health Solutions Inc. , Astora Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowen et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2017cv03133
Plaintiff:
Katie Bowen and Danny R. Bowen
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02785
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Bowen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s) WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A et al
as 1:2017cv00016
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s) WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A, Agnes E. Poe, Elizabeth A. Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Bowen v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv10172
Plaintiff:
Saleena Bowen
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowen v. USA
as 1:2016cv00201
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Wright Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bowens v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04520
Plaintiff:
Ann Bowens
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
