Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Bray v. Batts
as 2:2016cv02607
Petitioner:
Robert Bray
Respondent:
Myron Batts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC et al
as 2:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, Kenneth R. Lister, Elizabeth Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Clark v. Madison County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2014cv01081
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Lamont Clark
Defendant:
Madison County Sheriff's Department, Rudder, Petty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Ameridose, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Bray
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Bray v. Howerton
as 3:2012cv00657
Petitioner:
Randy Bray
Respondent:
Tony Howerton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bray v. Howerton
as 4:2013cv00002
Petitioner:
Randy Bray
Respondent:
Tony Howerton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLemore v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al (TV2)
as 2:2012cv00337
Plaintiff:
Christina McLemore
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Morgan & Pottinger, PSC and Anita L Bray
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bray v. RCB Trucking, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey K. Bray
Defendant:
RCB Trucking, LLC and Rhyn C. Brogden
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bray et al v. Grace House of Memphis, Tennessee
as 2:2012cv02542
Plaintiff:
Whitney Bray and Dianne Hampton
Defendant:
Grace House of Memphis, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Pruiett et al v. West End Restaurants, LLC
as 3:2011cv00747
Plaintiff:
Aron Pruiett , Allison Lowry , Jeron Bray and others
Defendant:
West End Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
