Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Hicks v. Blitz USA Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00543
Plaintiff:
Mark Hicks
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated , Wal-Mart Stores East LP , LCB Show Horses and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Surgenex LLC et al v. Predictive Therapeutic LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02483
Plaintiff:
Surgenex LLC and Abel Bullock
Defendant:
Predictive Therapeutic LLC, Predictive Biotech Incorporated, Utah Cord Bank Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nero et al v. Seifert
as 4:2016cv00684
Plaintiff:
Chris M Nero and Maria Bullock Nero
Defendant:
Ryan C Seifert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bullock v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv03658
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Bullock
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Donald Stapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bullock v. USA
as 4:2015cv00574
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Alan Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Conway et al v Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv01349
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Conway , Corey Musselman , San Antonio Orthopaedic Group LLP and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Incorporated, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01199
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bullock v. Nice Construction Company et al
as 4:2011cv00403
Plaintiff:
Marquez Kaim Bullock
Defendant:
Nice Construction Company and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv01000
Plaintiff:
Damien Lakieth Dudley
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv01877
Plaintiff:
Damian Dudley
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
