Cases 11 - 20 of 96
Webb v. Dunaway et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Bryant Dunaway, Craig Fickling, Cumberland County, TN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Harris
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, Nashville, Tennessee Legislature, Governor Bill Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Webb et al
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Lewanna Castillo Webb, Avery York, Jr., Jessica Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. United States
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Bill Ellis
Defendant:
Kevin S. Burgess, II and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Singleton et al v. Butler et al
as 3:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Singleton and Joyce Burgess
Defendant:
Katrina Butler and TSD Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Burgess v. Clendenion
as 1:2022cv00014
Petitioner:
Phillip Matthew Burgess
Respondent:
Jason Clendenion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clervrain v. Haget et al
as 2:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Tre Haget, Christopher Erlewine, John E. Hyten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pickett v. Barnett et al
as 1:2022cv00060
Defendant:
Ronnie Barnett, Bo, Tammie McCalpin and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. Five Below, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00144
Defendant:
Five Below, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Morris v. USA
as 2:2021cv00024
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kevin Burgess Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
