Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Barlow v. Sessions et al
as 2:2017cv00429
Plaintiff:
Clinton C Barlow, III
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions, Rodney Thompson, Thomas M Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vanwagner v. Baldwin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00281
Plaintiff:
John Edward Vanwagner
Defendant:
Baldwin County Sheriff's Office, Matthew Dean Stinson, Officer Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Helms et al
as 1:2014mc00015
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert A. Helms, Janniece S. Kaelin, Deven Sellers and others
Receiver:
Thomas L. Taylor, III and Andrew M. Goforth
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Barlow v. USA
as 1:2014cv00233
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Larry Dale Barlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vanwagner v. Baldwin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00639
Plaintiff:
John Edward Vanwagner
Defendant:
Baldwin County Sheriff's Office, Matthew Dean Stinson, Barlow and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanwagner v. Baldwin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv01561
Plaintiff:
John Edward Vanwagner
Defendant:
Baldwin County Sheriff's Office, Flowers, J Benett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Crasi v. Harper et al
as 2:2012cv02932
Plaintiff:
Oana Nicoleta Crasi
Defendant:
Silvia Harper and Richard Barlow
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
