Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Watson-Buisson v. Baron
as 1:2020cv01454
Respondent:
Joe Baron
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Watson-Buisson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Felton v. Baron
as 1:2020cv01187
Petitioner:
Antoine Ricardo Felton
Respondent:
Sheriff Baron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harrell v. Joseph et al
as 1:2020cv01008
Defendant:
Major O'Toole and Sheriff Baron Joseph
Plaintiff:
Derrell M. Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston v. Baron, et al
as 2:2020cv00335
Plaintiff:
LeAnthony T. Winston
Defendant:
Unknown, K. McForman, Joseph P. Baron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. City of Norfolk, Virginia, et al
as 2:2019cv00626
Defendant:
Kevin Griffin, Johnnie Herbert, Tommie Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caramillo v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00362
Defendant:
Susan D. Anderson, NP, Caniff, Timothy Wright, LPN and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Caramillo, Administrator of the Estate of Regina Marie Honeycutt, Deceased
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keeling v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Joseph P. Baron, Linda K. Bryant, Krasinda S. Barton, RN and others
Plaintiff:
Marcia A. Keeling, Administrator of the Estate of Davageah K. Jones, Deceased
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Champion v. Baron
as 1:2019cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Champion
Defendant:
Joseph P. Baron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Unknown
as 3:2018cv00880
Petitioner:
Montrell L. Gordon
Respondent:
Unknown, Joseph Baron and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nexus Derechos Humanos Attorneys, Inc. v. City of Norfolk Sheriff Joe Baron et al
as 2:2018cv00486
Plaintiff:
Nexus Derechos Humanos Attorneys, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Norfolk Sheriff Joe Baron, City of Portsmouth Sheriff Michael A. Moore and City of Chesapeake Sheriff Jim O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
