Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Bender v. USA
as 1:2013cv01153
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeremy Bender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bender et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2013cv00687
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bender and Marilyn Bender
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Romious v. Nixon et al
as 2:2012cv00013
Plaintiff:
Carlos Romious, Sr.
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, Chris Koster, James Ronald Carrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v Currency
as 5:2011cv01995
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Currency
Claimant:
Anthony Wright Bender
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Wasserman Media Group, LLC v. Bender
as 2:2011mc01867
Plaintiff:
Wasserman Media Group, LLC
Defendant:
Jonathan Bender
Bender v. Homer et al
as 5:2010cv01496
Plaintiff:
Vernecia L Bender
Defendant:
Town of Homer, Roger Smith, Mario Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bender v. Keffer
as 1:2009cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bender
Defendant:
Joe Keffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit et al
as 2:2008cv04583
Plaintiff:
Lester L. Washington
Defendant:
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit, Thomas M. Reavley, James L Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bender v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2008cv01962
Plaintiff:
Otis Bender, Otis Bender and Otis Bender
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Asante et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2008cv00871
Plaintiff:
Azariah Asante, Monsurat Atobatele, Denise Bailey and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
