Cases 11 - 20 of 97
BIGSBY v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2023cv01347
Defendant:
BISHOP, DAVIS, Property Officer G and others
Plaintiff:
NICK BIGSBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuery v. Walgreens - Store #10534
as 2:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Patricia Fuery
Defendant:
Walgreens - Store #10534
Not Classified By Court:
Gerald Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Bishop v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00646
Petitioner:
James Bishop and James Paul Bishop
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. HURT et al
as 1:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Defendant:
B. HURT, BLANTON, BOOKOUT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahone et al v. Becker et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mahone, Kevin Phillip Mahone, Sr, Hope Marie Allman and others
Defendant:
Vickie Becker, Anna Rich, Kris Seymore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BISHOP v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06947
Plaintiff:
AMY BISHOP
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PHILLIPS et al v. EDMONDS et al
as 1:2022cv02184
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
REAGAL, EDMONDS, A. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILLS v. MILLER et al
as 2:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY ROY HILLS
Defendant:
MILLER, BISHOP, MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BISHOP v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv01927
Plaintiff:
JEREMY ANDREW BISHOP
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO GROUP, INC., J. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
