Cases 11 - 20 of 32
BLACKWELL v. TRUEBLOOD et al
as 2:2017cv00363
Petitioner:
KEITH L. BLACKWELL
Respondent:
S. JULIAN, HEATHER MATA, E. TRUEBLOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TODERO v. TOWN OF GREENWOOD et al
as 1:2017cv01698
Defendant:
AS-YET UNIDENTIFIED GREENWOOD POLICE OFFICERS, BRIAN BLACKWELL, RENEE ELLIOT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES TODERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLACKWELL v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00241
Petitioner:
KEITH L. BLACKWELL
Respondent:
CHARLES A. DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Blackwell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv00290
Plaintiff:
James E Blackwell, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blackwell v. Caliban et al
as 2:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Nakiel Blackwell
Defendant:
Mark T Caliban and Kevin Electric Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLACKWELL v. ALVEY
as 3:2014cv00158
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY
Petitioner:
WILLIAM Q. BLACKWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackwell v. Caliban et al
as 2:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Nakiel Blackwell
Defendant:
Mark Caliban and Kevin Electric Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLACKWELL v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2013cv01260
Petitioner:
DAMON BLACKWELL
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA and SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
