Cases 11 - 20 of 3,363
Casterberry v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Anthony Lavelle Casterberry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Mills et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Daniel Mills, Judge Tracie Wright-Reneau, Prosecutor Jennifer Tharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02172
Petitioner:
Jasper Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Bobby Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Harris County, Fort Bend County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02126
Petitioner:
James Burchard Simpson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gallardo v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02158
Petitioner:
Joe Gallardo
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Molina v. Borik et al
as 7:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Herrado J. Molina
Defendant:
Michelle C. Borik, Isatu Bangura, Bobby L. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villafranco Jr. v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Jesse Villafranco Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Alfred Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans Jr. v. Lumpkin Case electronically transferred to Eastern District of Texas- Tyler.
as 6:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Evans Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
