Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Holmes v. Willis et al
as 4:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes
Defendant:
Cpl Willis, Sgt. Baxter, Cpl. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Wunderlich v. Conklin et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Robert Mitchell Wunderlich
Defendant:
Ed Conklin, Bowlero Inc. and United States Bowling Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Common Cause et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Common Cause, League of Women Voters of Georgia, Dr. Ursula Thomas and others
Defendant:
Brad Raffensperger, John Kennedy and Bonnie Rich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv04453
Plaintiff:
Jason Smith
Defendant:
Keith Williams, Linda Quiles, Robert Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawrence v. Movement Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv04160
Plaintiff:
Sherrod Lawrence
Defendant:
Movement Mortgage, LLC, Casey S. Crawford, Laura M. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
English v. Coleman et al
as 5:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Lt. Hammock, Officer Barkeley, Officer Spiers and others
Plaintiff:
James R. English, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Collins et al
as 1:2020cv04418
Defendant:
Kurt Collins and Christopher Bowles
Plaintiff:
Quincy Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gocher-Wright v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 1:2020cv04396
Plaintiff:
Karla Gocher-Wright
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reid v. Georgia Department of Labor et al
as 1:2020cv04032
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Labor, Ms. Bowles and Mark Butler
Plaintiff:
Rodney Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
