Cases 11 - 19 of 19
BEARD et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00922
Plaintiff:
YVETTE BEARD, JUDY BRANT, TERRY BROWN and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOSKINS v. BRANT
as 1:2015cv00338
Defendant:
KOBY BRANT
Plaintiff:
HOMER E. HOSKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brant v. Perry
as 3:2012cv00596
Plaintiff:
Philip J Brant
Defendant:
John Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brant v. Superintendent
as 3:2012cv00565
Petitioner:
Philip J Brant
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brant v. Wilson et al
as 3:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
Philip J Brant
Defendant:
William Wilson and Lt Cane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brant v. Superintendent
as 3:2008cv00524
Petitioner:
Philip J Brant
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carter et al v. Tyson Foods Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00209
Plaintiff:
David R Carter, David R Carter, David R Carter and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc and Tyson Fresh Meats Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Krilich Sr v. Soltesz/Brant Development Company et al
as 2:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert Krilich, Sr, Robert Krilich, Sr and Robert Krilich, Sr
Defendant:
Soltesz/Brant Development Company, Raymond T Soltesz and William J Brant, Jr
Garnishee:
Dunes Harbor LLC, William J Brant Jr & Associates LLP, Cathryn Brant-Tullidge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Krilich Sr v. Soltesz/Brant Development Company et al
as 2:2007cv00020
Plaintiff:
Robert Krilich, Sr and Robert Krilich, Sr
Defendant:
Soltesz/Brant Development Company, Raymond T Soltesz and William J Brant, Jr
Garnishee:
Dunes Harbor LLC, William J Brant Jr & Associates LLP, Cathryn Brant-Tullidge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
