Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Bristol-Gonzalgo v. United States Department of the Navy et al
as 2:2012cv02043
Plaintiff:
Maria Jean Bristol-Gonzalgo
Defendant:
United States Department of the Navy, Raul Vargas and Jane Doe Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Montes et al v. City of Yakima et al
as 2:2012cv03108
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Montes and Mateo Arteaga
Defendant:
City of Yakima , Micah Cawley , Maureen Adkison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DeSousa v. Providence St. Peter Hospital et al
as 3:2012cv05363
Plaintiff:
Roger DeSousa
Defendant:
Providence St. Peter Hospital, Angela Tobias, Psychiatric and Counseling Services of Olympia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zhou v. Carter et al
as 2:2010cv01538
Plaintiff:
Long Zhou
Defendant:
Bruce L A Carter, James A Harper, Edward E Penhoet and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mesa v. ZymoGenetics Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01486
Plaintiff:
Rhonda M. Mesa
Defendant:
ZymoGenetics Inc, BRUCE L.A. CARTER, JAMES A. HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
White v. Bristol Meyer-Squibb
as 2:2010cv00203
Plaintiff:
James Herman White
Defendant:
Bristol Meyer-Squibb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bristol Bay Reserve et al v. Par-Pac Inc
as 3:2009cv05552
Plaintiff:
Bristol Bay Reserve, Bristol Bay Reserve, Guy Hoy and others
Defendant:
Par-Pac Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Property Damage
Barkman et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2007cv00845
Plaintiff:
Gwyn P Barkman, Gwyn P Barkman, Fredrick Stanley Barkman, Jr and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Bowen, et al v. Schering-Plough Corp, et al
as 2:2001cv00303
Defendant:
Schering Plough Healthcare Inc and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
