Cases 11 - 20 of 23
WALTON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv03125
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE WALTON , EARLINE WALTON , KENNETH W. BLAIR and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BROOKINS v. VERIZON TELEPHONE COMPANY
as 2:2012cv01767
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BROOKINS
Defendant:
VERIZON TELEPHONE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BROOKINS et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv01429
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE BROOKINS and DONALD BROOKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, RONALD W. ABSTEN, KEVIN J. SWIMKOSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROOKINS v. PA. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 2:2012cv02381
Petitioner:
JOHN DAVID BROOKINS
Respondent:
PA. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROOKINS v. USA
as 2:2012cv00012
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BROOKINS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BROOKINS v. CUIFI et al
as 2:2011cv00784
Plaintiff:
EUGENE BROOKINS
Defendant:
DANIEL CUIFI and BOROUGH OF WILKINSBURG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKINS v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv79019
Plaintiff:
LINDSEY C. BROOKINS
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKINS v. BRITTON et al
as 2:2009cv01339
Petitioner:
CECIL BROOKINS
Respondent:
RANDALL BRITTON, TOM CORBETT and STEPHEN ZAPPALA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROOKINS v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77566
Plaintiff:
LANEY A. BROOKINS and LANEY A. BROOKINS
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKINS v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77866
Plaintiff:
HILDA BROOKINS and HILDA BROOKINS
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
