Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Mothershead v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2018cv04025
Plaintiff:
Darron Francis Mothershead
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2017cv00309
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lee White
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Newland, Wilcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anguiano v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Alberto Anguiano
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Billy D Frazier, IV
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Beaumont Texas, John Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2011cv00270
Petitioner:
Harold Lindsey Webster
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and US Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Riches v. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington et al
as 4:2010cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Melanie Togman Sloan, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2009cv04101
Petitioner:
Tony Darnell Smith
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woodworth v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2009cv00157
Plaintiff:
Murray A Woodworth
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunham v. Polk County Jail, et al
as 4:2008cv00354
Plaintiff:
David Winslow Dunham
Defendant:
Polk County Jail, Federal Bureau of Prisons and D Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christensen v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2008cv04063
Plaintiff:
Justin Bradley Christensen
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
