Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Kenneth Barbour v. Lieutenant Burgin
as 10-7273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BURGIN, SERGEANT COLLINS, C/O FRANKLIN and others
Kenneth Barbour v. A. Rabie
as 10-7268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
A. RABIES, STANFORD, 28 U.S.C. 1915(G) 2403 and others
Kenneth Barbour v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, VDOC's Director, BYRON WATSON, Warden, WRSP and INVESTIGATOR MCBRIBE
Kenneth Barbour v. Ms. Staughbury
as 10-7084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
STAUGHBURY, GENE M. JOHNSON and BYRON WATSON
Emmanuel Shaw v. Byron Watson
as 10-7079
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMMANUEL KING SHAW
Respondent - Appellee:
BYRON WATSON, Warden
Kenneth Barbour v. VA NGRI Law 2403 (b) may apply
as 10-7078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
VA NGRI LAW 2403 (B) MAY APPLY, AUSTIPITHECUS ROBUSTUS, GENE M. JOHNSON, VDOC's Director and others
Barbour v. Burgin et al
as 7:2010cv00335
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Barbour
Defendant:
Lt. Burgin, Former Sgt. Collins, C/O Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Homo Sapiens Sapiens et al
as 7:2010cv00283
Defendant:
Attorney General Of Virginia, Homo Sapiens Sapiens, Gene Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Sanford et al
as 7:2010cv00274
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Mr. Kensey, "Who They Where Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. East India Tarsier Standford et al
as 2:2010cv00254
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
East India Tarsier Standford, Byron Watson, Genen M. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
