Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Cincinnati Insurance Company State of Ohio v. Adams Homes, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00535
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Insurance Company State of Ohio
Defendant:
Adams Homes, LLC, Butler & Associates of Pensacola, Inc., William B. Dobbins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Peterson et al
as 1:2016cv00625
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
Kenneth Peterson, Kevin Bishop and Captain Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Estes (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00797
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
Dewayne Estes and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Estes
as 2:2013cv01377
Petitioner:
Rashad C Lee
Respondent:
Dewayne Estes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Thomas et al
as 5:2013cv01365
Plaintiff:
Rashad C Lee
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, James Deloach, Grant Culliver and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 3:2013cv00315
Plaintiff:
Lovena C. Lee
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Sandra Giles and Sylvester Nettles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2012cv00328
Plaintiff:
Rashad C Lee
Defendant:
Billy C Mitchem, Jimmy Patrick and Patrick Robinson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
