Cases 11 - 20 of 116
Patterson v. State of Georgia
as 1:2022cv04808
Petitioner:
James C. Patterson
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Simpson et al
as 1:2022cv01303
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
Elisabeth Simpson, Joel Arnold, Wade Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Mercer et al
as 3:2021cv00620
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Donald Bryant, Timothy Hardrick and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. ARNOLD et al
as 1:2021cv00088
Defendant:
WADE OWENS, LAUREN PARISH, Judge WADE MERCER and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. MERCER et al
as 7:2021cv00053
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DONALD BRYANT, JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Eppinger
as 5:2021cv00777
Respondent:
Warden LaShann Eppinger
Petitioner:
Brandon C. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Simpson et al
as 1:2021cv00606
Defendant:
Wade Owens, Public Defender Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, Joel Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. De Feis
as 21-427
Defendant:
Nicholas M. DeFeis, Vera M. Kachnowski and Philip C. Patterson
Defendant / Appellee:
De Feis O'Connell & Rose, P.C.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rose Ramey Long, AKA Rose Ramey Littlejohn, AKA Rose Long Fine Art, AKA RRL Fine Art
Patterson v. Bio-Medical Applications of Alabama, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00590
Defendant:
Bio-Medical Applications of Alabama, Inc. doing business as Fresenius Kidney Care USA Midtown, et al.
Plaintiff:
Arelia C. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92433
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER C. PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
