Cases 11 - 20 of 487
Cartagena v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
ANGEL CARTAGENA
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Cartagena
as 23-1871
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE CARTAGENA, t/n Jose Ruben Cartagena-Rodriguez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cartagena v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
Domingo Cartagena
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cartagena et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv08711
Plaintiff:
Israel Cartagena, Annieli Acevedo, Maryalice Alston-Harris and others
Defendant:
City of New York and New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
William Cartagena v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04802
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Cartagena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tyler v. Hutchinson et al
as 8:2023cv02154
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Tyler
Defendant:
Neil Hutchinson, Hector Alejandro Cartagena Gonzalez and Fellowship Photos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv03607
Petitioner:
Refinera de Cartagena S.A.S.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Refinera de Cartagena S.A.S.
as 4:2023mc01641
Petitioner:
Refinera de Cartagena S.A.S.
Defendant:
McDermott International, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
