Cases 11 - 20 of 1,559
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Washington v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00310
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dewayne Washington, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Venequip, S.A. v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 1:2024cv22582
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Venequip, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Sanchez-Wright et al v. Caterpillar Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01185
Defendant:
Vulcan Materials Company and Caterpillar Inc
Plaintiff:
Victoria Sanchez-Wright and Dominque Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Goodall et al v. Barber Brothers Contracting Company, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00469
Defendant:
Barber Brothers Contracting Company, L.L.C., Caterpillar Inc. and Southern Paving Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Goodall and Erika Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CRC TRANSPORT LLC v. CATERPILLER INC
as 3:2024cv00233
Defendant:
CATERPILLAR INC
Plaintiff:
CRC TRANSPORT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Goodall et al v. Barber Brothers Contracting Company, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2024cv01485
Plaintiff:
Robert Goodall and Erika Williams
Defendant:
Southern Paving Co., Inc., Caterpillar Inc. and Barber Brothers Contracting Company, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Caterpillar Inc. v. Wirtgen America, Inc.
as 24-1865
Appellant:
CATERPILLAR INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 24-1802
Appellant:
WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CATERPILLAR INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
