Cases 11 - 20 of 29
WILLIAMS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
CARNELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AMANDA WEST, SCI HOUTZDALE SUPERINTENDENT CAMERON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Walker v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 15-1178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, DORETTA CHENCHARICK, Supt. Asst./Grievance Coordinator, SCI Houtzdale, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DIEHL and others
JAY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, KENNETH CAMERON, STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY LITTLE, CHENCHARICK, SAWTELLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. SHARP et al
as 3:2014cv00255
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
DONALD SHARP, JOINER, HOLLIBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2014cv00256
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY LITTLE, DEFELICE, CHENCHARICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COULSTON v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
TROY COULSTON
Defendant:
STEVEN GLUNT, MR. WILT, MR. YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas Pracht v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm
as 14-1066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. PRACHT
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN HOUTZDALE SCI, PARKS, Assistant Librarian, In Both His Official and Indivual Capacities and others
WALKER v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2013cv00249
Plaintiff:
TERRY WALKER
Defendant:
STEVEN R. GLUNT, DORETTA CHENCHARICK, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DIEHL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOUMARE v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
SAMBA SOUMARE
Defendant:
DAVID J. CLOSE, CAPTAIN BRUMBAUGH, LT. HORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
