Cases 11 - 20 of 246
Hood et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023at00101
Plaintiff:
Susan Hood and Chester McNabb
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chester v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv06679
Plaintiff:
Carson Chester
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(HC)Chester v. Trate
as 1:2022cv01368
Petitioner:
Jerry Chester
Respondent:
Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Christopher Chester v. JRM Financial LLC et al
as 2:2022cv07426
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chester
Defendant:
JRM Financial LLC, Anchor Loans LP, Hon Holly J Fujie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
JRM Financial, LLC v. Chris Chester et al
as 2:2022cv07427
Plaintiff:
JRM Financial, LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Chester and Mackie Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Clark v. Perez-Pantoja
as 4:2022cv04460
Plaintiff:
Chester Clark
Defendant:
Sgt. I. Perez-Pantoja
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zach Lehman et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04964
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lerry, Zach Lehman, Brandon Scott and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Carl Abner et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05005
Plaintiff:
Carl Abner, Donna Adair, Jason Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
JRM Financial LLC v. Chris Chester et al
as 2:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
JRM Financial LLC
Defendant:
Chris Chester, Mackie Gibson and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
