Cases 11 - 20 of 32
STOLLARD v. GWYNN et al
as 1:2019cv00926
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN STOLLARD
Defendant:
C/O GWYNN, ASST. SUPT. CASSADE, SUPT. CARVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Dept. Adult Corrections Warren CI
as 5:2018cv00144
Petitioner:
Robert H. Johnson
Respondent:
Dept. Adult Corrections Warren CI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fullard v. Perry et al
as 5:2017ct03158
Plaintiff:
Reginald Fullard
Defendant:
Frank Perry, Lumberton CI - Transportation, Lumberton CI - Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEY v. DENTIST DEPARTMENT AT SCOTLAND CI
as 1:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
ROGER EARL COLEY
Defendant:
DENTIST DEPARTMENT AT SCOTLAND CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RB/WH Rocky Mount CI LLC, et al v. General Electric Company, et al
as 5:2016cv00292
Plaintiff:
RB/WH Rocky Mount CI LLC and National Trust Insurance Company
Defendant:
General Electric Company and Sharp Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Dyke v. Cogburn et al
as 1:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Van Dyke
Defendant:
Max Cogburn, Jr., Frank D. Whitney, Graham C. Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. Whitney et al
as 1:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
Frank D. Whitney and Green CI
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. United States Probation Office, Probation Staff et al
as 1:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dennis Van Dyke
Defendant:
United States Probation Office, Probation Staff, State of North Carolina Department of Corrections, Avery Mitchell CI and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BURCHAM v. LANESBORO CI
as 1:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
RICHARD STEPHEN BURCHAM
Defendant:
LANESBORO CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. MULLEN et al
as 1:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, CLERK OF COURT ASHEVILLE WESTERN DISTRICT USDC, CLERKS OF COURT RUTHERFORDTON NC DISTRICT AND SUPERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
