Cases 11 - 20 of 32
The City of Annapolis, Maryland v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv01162
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Physical Medicine and Pain Management Associates, P.C., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Annapolis, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hulbert et al v. Pantelides et al
as 1:2016cv04121
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W Hulbert, Firearms Policy Foundation and Firearms Policy Coalition
Defendant:
Michael A Pristoop, Mike Pantelides and The City of Annapolis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CDM Smith/Haskell v. The City of Annapolis, Maryland
as 1:2016cv02621
Defendant:
The City of Annapolis, Maryland
Plaintiff:
CDM Smith/Haskell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sparrow v. City of Annapolis (MD) et al
as 1:2016cv01394
Plaintiff:
Towhee A. Sparrow, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Annapolis (MD) , Christopher Kintop and Robert Reese, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gale v. Annapolis City Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv02803
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Gale
Defendant:
Annapolis City Police Department, City of Annapolis, Anne Arundel County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
City of Annapolis v. Bowen, Jr. et al
as 1:2014cv02558
Plaintiff:
City of Annapolis
Defendant:
Edgar A Bowen, Jr., Kenneth S Ashton, Gene Craig Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
M.T. v. Officer Craig Medley
as 1:2014cv00424
Plaintiff:
M.T.
Defendant:
Craig Medley, Annapolis Police Department and The City of Annapolis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
