Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Flynn et al v. City of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2018cv07688
Defendant:
Janice Rivera, Duane Walker, City of Santa Clara and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Flynn, Kyle Flynn and Lauren Alcarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Whittington et al
as 5:2018cv02581
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Michael Whittington, Dale Morgan, County of Santa Clara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv05204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wiley v. City Of Gilroy et al
as 5:2017cv03178
Plaintiff:
Willie Marquice Wiley
Defendant:
City Of Gilroy, Adam Moon, Denise Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez et al v. City Of Gilroy et al
as 5:2017cv00625
Plaintiff:
Alma Ramirez , H.A. and L.A.
Defendant:
City Of Gilroy and Adam Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alvarado et al v. City of Gilroy et al
as 5:2014cv03172
Defendant:
Ryan Warren, Jason Broyer, Todd R. Kessler and others
Plaintiff:
Alberto Alvarado, B.A. a minor and Martha Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Edward Bozzo, et al v. City of Gilroy
as 13-17298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD BOZZO and PHILLIP KING
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF GILROY
Liberty PCS, LLC v. City of Gilroy et al
as 5:2013cv03997
Plaintiff:
Liberty PCS, LLC
Defendant:
City of Gilroy and Scott Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
California Business Services Center LLC v. City of Santa Rosa et al
as 3:2013cv03820
Plaintiff:
California Business Services Center LLC
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa and Jill Ravitch
Movant:
City Of Gilroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Estate of Gurmit Singh et al v. City of Gilroy et al
as 5:2009cv00740
Plaintiff:
A.S., Estate of Gurmit Singh, Paramjit Kaur and others
Defendant:
City of Gilroy, Royce Heath, Stuart Jaquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
