Cases 11 - 20 of 78
DIGGS v. CITY OF WOODBURY et al
as 1:2017cv11994
Plaintiff:
LAMAR DIGGS
Defendant:
CITY OF WOODBURY, THOMAS R RYAN, MATTHEW PORTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Sample v. City of Woodbury, et al
as 15-3213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David J. Sample
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Woodbury, Mark J. Vierling, Sean P. Stokes and others
Henderson v. City of Woodbury et al
as 0:2015cv03332
Plaintiff:
Tawana Henderson
Defendant:
City of Woodbury, Officer Anthony Ofsted, Officer Natalie Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sapp v. City of Baudette et al
as 0:2015cv01589
Plaintiff:
Richard Sapp
Defendant:
City of Baudette , City of Big Lake , City of Brooklyn Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sample v. City of Woodbury et al
as 0:2015cv00602
Plaintiff:
David J. Sample
Defendant:
City of Woodbury , Mark J. Vierling , Sean P. Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diane Catherine Gavin v. Anoka County, et al
as 14-3404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Diane Catherine Gavin
Defendant - Appellee:
Anoka County, City of Apple Valley, City of Arlington and others
Timothy Wallace Sherno v. Anoka County, et al
as 14-3288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Wallace Sherno
Defendant - Appellee:
Anoka County, City of Apple Valley, City of Arlington and others
Garn v. City of Brooklyn Park et al
as 0:2014cv04196
Plaintiff:
Barbara Garn
Defendant:
Brooklyn Park, City of, Crystal, City of, Kandiyohi County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarah Kristine Tichich v. City of Bloomington, et al
as 14-3151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sarah Kristine Tichich
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Bloomington, City of Cannon Falls, City of Lakeville and others
Sherno v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2014cv00982
Defendant:
Anoka County , City of Apple Valley , City of Arlington and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wallace Sherno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.