Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Moore v. Clarke County, MS et al
as 3:2020cv00464
Defendant:
Clarke County, MS, Sheriff Todd Kemp, John Does 1-4 and others
Plaintiff:
Erin Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tilman v. Clarke County et al
as 2:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Deputy Benjamin Ivy, Clarke County, Sheriff Todd Kemp and others
Plaintiff:
Marquis Tilman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Clarke County Jail et al
as 2:2019cv00187
Defendant:
Clarke County Jail and Barry White
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jamarcus Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Clarke County Circuit Court
as 3:2018cv00810
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
John Kenneth Stewart
Respondent:
Clarke County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clarke County, Mississippi v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
Clarke County, Mississippi
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunn v. Clarke County, Mississippi
as 2:2017cv00096
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A. Dunn
Defendant:
Clarke County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
American Civil Rights Union v. Clarke County, Mississippi Election
as 2:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
American Civil Rights Union
Defendant:
Clarke County, Mississippi Election Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lynch v. Ivy et al
as 2:2014cv00106
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo D. Lynch
Defendant:
Dale Ivy, Harvey Hester, James Moseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. White et al
as 2:2014cv00030
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Porter
Defendant:
Barry White, Dale Ivy, Danny Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harbour v. Clarke County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2013cv00280
Plaintiff:
Michael Dave Harbour
Defendant:
Clarke County, Mississippi , Todd Kemp , Barry White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
