Cases 11 - 19 of 19
JONES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv00754
Petitioner:
CLEVELAND JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and CHARLIE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keel et al v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2014cv01520
Plaintiff:
William Keel, Jacob Hughes, Jeffrey Reed and others
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Daron Hall, Tommy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keel et al v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2014mc00740
Plaintiff:
William Keel, Jacob Hughes, Jeffrey Reed and others
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Daron Hall, Tommy Smith and others
Williams v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2011cv01074
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Jones and Mark Williams
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Sheriffs Calcasieu, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2011cv00945
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Jones
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Sheriffs Calcasieu, Dept of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McGee et al v. Thor Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07830
Plaintiff:
Ella McGee, Ella McGee, Ella McGee and others
Defendant:
Thor Industries, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. David et al
as 0:2008cv61274
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Jones
Defendant:
Monica David, Tena M. Pate, Frederick B. Dunphy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JONES v. DAVID et al
as 4:2007cv00419
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND JONES
Defendant:
MONICA DAVID, TENA M PATE, FREDERIC B DUNPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cleveland Jones v. Jimmy Walker
as 2:2007cv01616
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Jones
Defendant:
Jimmy Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
