Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Coleman v. Humana, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
James Coleman
Defendant:
Humana, Inc. and Aspen Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Coleman v. USA
as 4:2023cv00066
Petitioner:
Stye Lamar Coleman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Coleman v. Medwatchers Inc.
as 5:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
James Coleman
Defendant:
Medwatchers Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Addington et al v. Southport Marina, Inc.
as 7:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
Coleman Shaughnessy, Richard Burke, Deborah Turlington and others
Counter Defendant:
Joseph Griffin, Rodney James Hyson, John Scism and others
Defendant:
Southport Marina, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
SCOTT v. BUFFALOE et al
as 1:2022cv00802
Petitioner:
WILLIAM COLEMAN SCOTT
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR. and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JACKSON v. COLEMAN USP 1
as 1:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
PATRICK JACKSON
Defendant:
COLEMAN USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Coleman v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02062
Petitioner:
Eric Coleman
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Albemarle District Jail
as 5:2022ct03010
Plaintiff:
Stye Lamar Coleman
Defendant:
Albemarle District Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. USP Coleman et al
as 3:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
USP Coleman, Medical and FNU Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 3:2021cv00608
Plaintiff:
Gia Lee
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, John Salvador, Shelley Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
