Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 169
PAGAN v. SUPERINTENDANT TICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv03308
Petitioner: LUIS FERDINAND PAGAN, III
Respondent: SUPERINTENDANT TICE, PA PAROLE BOARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURKE v. STEBERGER et al
as 5:2022cv02712
In Re: ROBERT BURKE
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER, CHERYL STEBERGER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MYERS v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2022cv02720
Petitioner: MICHAEL MYERS and MICHAEL LEE MYERS
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02464
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.A. et al v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv01621
Plaintiff: A.A. and DANIELLE ROWE
Defendant: CITY OF LANCASTER, DETECTIVE AUSTIN KRAUSE, EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Miguelina Pena v. City of Lancaster, et al
as 22-1320
Plaintiff / Appellee: MIGUELINA PENA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF RICARDO MUNOZ, DECEASED
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF LANCASTER, a municipal corporation, JARRAD BERKIHISER, in his individual and official capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF LANCASTER, KARSON ARNOLD, in his individual and official capacity as police officer for the CITY OF LANCASTER and others
Petitioner / Appellant: STANLEY J. CATERBONE
GARCIA v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI-HUNTINGDON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv05583
Petitioner: CARLOS R. GARCIA
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT, SCI-HUNTINGDON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnny Procopio, et al v. Arizona Division of Child Supp, et al
as 21-16010
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF MARICOPA, named as 45 CFR 302.34 Maricopa County Arizona, STATE OF NEBRASKA, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY, named as 42 654(3) Arizona Department of Economic Security Child Support Enforcement Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHNNY RAY PROCOPIO
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF ARIZONA
RUIZ-RIVERA v. CITY AND COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv02105
Defendant: POLICE OFFICER LAPP, POLICE OFFICER JACOB BINGHAM, FICTITIOUS DESIGNATION and others
Plaintiff: IVAN RUIZ-RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIRIANO v. MARSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv02049
Petitioner: MIGUEL A. LIRIANO
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER, ROBERT MARSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?